FACTION MAN: Bill
Shorten’s Path to Power
DAVID MARRQuarterly Essay No. 59, Black Inc., 2015
Yesterday, upon the stair,
I met a man who wasn’t there.He wasn’t there again today,
I wish that man would go away…….
This old and highly serviceable piece of doggerel seems almost
custom-made for Australian Labor Party leader, Bill Shorten. Even the usually perceptive journalist, David
Marr, in his latest political profile for Quarterly
Essay, is defeated by the indistinct and bland Shorten who, in public
opinion polls, trails behind ‘Someone Else’ as preferred leader of the Labor
Opposition.
Personable and capable, but not memorable, is the assessment,
says Marr, of Shorten’s time at the
wealthy Catholic Xavier College, which specialises in processing Melbourne’s
future judges and surgeons but which took on the working class grandson of
union men. An effective factional
engineer, but politically uninspiring, was Shorten’s hallmark at Monash
University in the early 1980s as a “star of the Labor Right” in the ALP Club.
Subsequent factional powerplays by this “tough backroom
fighter” were the means to fulfilling Shorten’s undisguised personal ambition –
first as National Secretary of the Australian Workers Union, then as Leader of
the Opposition (a Labor Caucus choice, with 86 of those parliamentarians having
as much say as 30,000 rank-and-file party members), and finally with the Prime
Ministership in his sights.
Marr does not think Shorten will get the top job. Personally congenial, and not without a
certain small-room persuasiveness (“his best work is done face to face”), Shorten
lacks the qualities to move a nation. He
is numbingly wooden and formulaic as a public agitator. He is personally and politically close to big
business - his first marriage was to a wealthy Liberal blue-blood, whilst Business Review Weekly once declared that
Shorten (Master of Business Administration, Melbourne Uni) would make a fine
corporate chief executive. He is uncritically
pro-US and conventional on national security and defence (Shorten was a member
of the University Regiment at Monash).
He robotically intones the hollowed-out stock ALP brand
identifiers of “jobs, education and health” but, says Marr, “he stands for
nothing brave”. He has no galvanising
political philosophy. He is distrusted
in his own party and within the electorate as a “plotter who brought down two
ALP leaders to clear his own way to power”, a “shape-shifter” always accompanied
by “so many new best friends” in his self-advancement crusade. These negatives were not debilitating whilst
Shorten was pitted against the hard-right Liberal Prime Minister, Tony Abbott, but
his substance is now exposed to more scrutiny following Abbott’s replacement
(which post-dates Marr’s essay).
The electorate, says Marr, finds Shorten “hard to
read”. So does Marr. Shorten slips through the fingers of Marr, who,
in desperation for biographical material, resorts to an analysis of Shorten’s
mirthless ‘zingers’. Marr’s difficulties
are partly due to Shorten’s sheer vapidness but also because of Marr’s failure
to situate Shorten as a symptom of Labor’s fundamental political bankruptcy.
Whilst Marr delves into the grungy workings under the hood
of the Labor machine, he doesn’t address just where Labor is headed or why. For whether Shorten, the master factional
mechanic, or any of the nominally ‘Left’, ‘Right’ or ‘Centre’ drivers is at the
wheel, the Labor jalopy sputters along the same road to nowhere, dispensing, at
best, modest, piecemeal and utterly inadequate reform whilst dedicated to its
larger goal of maintaining the wealth and power of the corporate class.
Nevertheless, Marr is spot on in his observation that Shorten
“has no radical designs, no great plans for reform” and “represents nil
challenge to capitalism”. The same, however,
applies for Labor as a broader political entity. The party might be running on (Mr.) Empty at
the moment but even when tanked up, the party’s business-friendly and
pro-capitalist political design makes it a complete lemon.
No comments:
Post a Comment