LEONARDO PADURA
Bitter Lemon Press, 2014, 576 pages, $27.99 (pb)
Leon Trotsky refused to let paranoia about his
all-but-inevitable assassination cramp his political life in his Mexican refuge,
even receiving Jacques Mornard, the suspicious Belgian businessman and partner
of a trusted New York Trotskyist bearing his poorly-written political article in
one hand and a mountaineer’s ice-pick concealed beneath his coat in the other.
In The Man Who Loved
Dogs, the Cuban novelist, Leonardo Padura, artistically reconstructs Trotsky’s
assassination by the Spanish Communist, Ramón Mercader, who infiltrated
Trotsky’s compound in that disguise and committed the murder on one terrible
August day in 1940.
Mercader, a heroic communist fighting Franco’s fascists
during the Spanish Civil War, had been tapped for darker deeds against the
non-Communist left by the Stalin’s secret police. Stalin, the ‘gravedigger of the revolution’
as Trotsky called him, feared his sole remaining Old Bolshevik rival who was
the Marxist symbol of opposition to the “bureaucratic minority protecting its
material interests” in Soviet Russia through brutal purges, farcical show
trials and other “horrifying crimes against humanity, dignity and
intelligence”.
After killing Trotsky, Mercader served twenty years in jail
before returning to Moscow to a mixed reception as a Hero of the Soviet Union
but also “one of the more annoying proofs of Stalinism” for a neo-Stalinist
regime modernising its tools of repression.
A terminally-ill Mercader spent his last years in Cuba.
In Padura’s novel, Mercader, now remorsefully realising that
he was the “puppet of a dark and miserable plan” based on cynical lies told by
Stalin about Trotsky, feels compelled to tell his story which he does to Iván
Cárdenas,
a once-promising but now disgraced Cuban writer. Cárdenas sits on the sensational story fearing
“complications of all kinds” from writing about contraband history - in Cuba, there
was “programmed ignorance” about Trotsky because of Cuba’s economic dependence
on the Soviet Union.
With the downfall of Mercader’s Soviet world, however, Cárdenas
picks up his pen again only to discover, against all his instincts, some compassion
for Mercader as a victim of Stalin, summonsing Trotsky as witness to “the
degree of perversion that Stalin’s influence had injected into the souls of
men”, including once-idealistic communists who instead entered history as
reviled murderers.
Mercader, however, may be just a grotesque extreme of an
inevitable corruption of the socialist utopia, suggests Padura. He has Trotsky, the iconic anti-Stalinist revolutionary,
ruminate guiltily on how much responsibility he shares for Stalinist despotism,
for the “excesses he himself had committed in order to defend the revolution”
when, under desperate duress, Trotsky (and Lenin) forcefully ate away at
democracy in the working class and the Bolshevik Party.
Are all great utopian dreams condemned to failure, ponders Cárdenas,
with the authentic biographical ring of Padura himself. Padura’s fictional alter-ego had, in his
youth, cut sugarcane with “militant enthusiasm and invincible faith” in the
Cuban revolution but after living through years of “sexual, religious,
ideological and cultural intransigence”, and the material poverty of the
post-Soviet, pre-Venezuelan 1990s, has now drifted into “skepticism and
sadness”.
“My capacity to believe had been ruined forever”, laments Cárdenas,
reflecting on “the great disenchantment” of failed communist dreams in the
Soviet Union, China, Cuba and elsewhere, all doomed by Stalin’s toxic legacy.
Despite his loss of faith, however, Padura has not left Cuba
where official cultural caution (The Man
Who Loved Dogs was initially given only a limited distribution) is buffeted
by the winds of political change. Padura
has recently won a national literary prize even as his detective novels, on
which his international fame is based, continue to tackle government corruption
and social inequality.
In his finely-wrought, if overly-long, novel, Padura’s
political pessimism vies with his admiration for Trotsky, imperfect and capable
of error but whose revolutionary spirit survived the assassin’s ice-pick and continues
to challenge the jaded cynicism of the corrupted and disillusioned.
No comments:
Post a Comment