THE
KAISER'S HOLOCAUST: Germany's Forgotten Genocide and the Colonial Roots of
Nazism
by
DAVID OLUSOGA and CASPER W. ERICHSENfaber and faber, 2010, 394 pages, $45 (hb)
Review by Phil Shannon
Shark
Island, just off the coast of Namibia, can lay claim, with three and a half
thousand Africans systematically killed by German colonialists early last
century, to being the birthplace of the modern death camp. This invention was
to be massively expanded in scope by the inventors' Nazi successors three
decades later. David Olusoga and Casper
Erichsen, in The Kaiser's Holocaust, document this terrible lineage of
racial genocide.
The
indigenous people of south-west Africa felt the full force of German
colonialism during the imperialist 'scramble for Africa' in the late nineteenth
century. The successful German colonial
movement was led by right wing nationalists who raised the cry of lebensraum
(living space), supported by Germany's business class which reaped the
super-profits to be had from a colonial trade based on cheap indigenous raw
materials and captive export markets.
Using
the familiar colonial tools of unfair treaties, 'divide and rule' exploitation
of tribal differences, and enrichment of an indigenous elite, Germany secured
the fourth-largest European empire in Africa.
In German South-West Africa, however, much of this control was only
nominal, with significant indigenous land ownership remaining intact.
Increasing
the rate of the land grab, combined with the flourishing pseudo-science of
racial 'social darwinism', meant doom for the indigenous tribes of the colony
who were regarded by German colonialists as the 'weaker race' with no future.
First,
the Herero tribe were targeted in a colonial war in 1903. The German military commander, General von
Trotha, viewed the Herero as Unmenschen (non-humans), and his
self-described policy of 'absolute terrorism' through artillery shells, the
Maxim machine gun and a policy of taking no prisoners (women and children
included) resulted in a slaughter of the 50,000 rebel Herero and the flight of
the survivors into the Omakeke (Kalahari) desert. 'Cleansing Patrols' mopped up any surviving
Herero by shooting on sight.
Opposition
by socialist deputies in Germany's parliament, and internationally, to the
Herero annihilation forced Berlin to refine its strategy through adoption of
the Konzentrationslager (concentration camp). These had initially been pioneered by Britain
in the Boer War but Berlin's innovation was to add 'extermination through
labour' to the lexicon of barbarism.
Collected
by the renamed 'Peace Patrols', or forced into the camps by hunger, no Herero
prisoners survived more than ten months in the camps. Inadequately fed, housed in huts made of
rags, abused, raped and overworked, they died in their thousands. The forced labour of the concentration camps
was a "continuation of their extermination, by non-military means".
Whilst
the Herero may have been considered good for slave labour, the other major
tribe, the Nama, were not. The
short-statured Nama were, "like the Aboriginals of Tasmania", a
people whose labour was deemed to be of little value. After suppressing a guerilla uprising by one
Nama clan, other clans were deceived into surrender by the promise of 'free
settlements' only to be sent to the concentration camp at Shark Island where
they died from malnutrition, beatings and exposure, with forced labour playing
just a secondary role. Shark Island's
focus was pure extermination.
Of
80,000 pre-war Herero, 80% had been killed or driven out of German South-West
Africa by 1908 whilst a Nama population of 20,000 had been reduced to
13,000. Total extermination had not been
achieved, not because of a change of heart but because of the logistical
impossibility of total eradication "in a country of 82.4 million hectares,
with inadequate maps, almost no roads, [and] pre-World War 1 military
technology". The land robbery was
complete, however, and 15,000 German settlers worked the surviving Herero as
virtual slaves on land they once owned, whilst the Nama were confined to
marginal reserves.
The
fruits of Germany's ethnic cleansing were passed on to the British empire after
World War 1 with South-West Africa becoming a British Protectorate administered
by South Africa. With supreme hypocrisy,
given its own record of colonial violence, London enthusiastically publicised
Berlin's horrors in German South-West Africa for their propaganda value in
supporting London's annexation of the former German colony, duly granted in the
post-war Treaty of Versailles in 1919.
For
the German right, including the Nazis, their longing for Berlin's lost colonies
after Germany's expulsion from the club of colonial powers became a mobilising
force. Nazi ideology, policies and
personnel owed much to Germany's colonial record in Africa.
The
right wing Freikorps paramilitary groups, which drowned in blood the
German socialist revolution at the end of World War 1, contained many former
colonial soldiers who subsequently joined the Nazi party, like General Franz
von Epp, a veteran of the colonial genocides against the Herero and Nama, who
recruited Hitler into the ultra-right-wing militia in 1922.
Heinrich
Goring, father of Hitler's deputy, Hermann Goring, was the first Imperial
Commissioner of German South-West Africa.
Like his son, he was a committed imperialist, though his
conscience-salving belief in the 'civilising mission' of imperialism was a
notion that his exterminist son dispensed with.
The
colonial ideology of 'living space' expanded its scope under the Nazis to
encompass Poland and the Soviet Union whose Slavic people were viewed as 'white
niggers' and Untermenschen (sub-humans), along with Jews, by the Nazis
and their 'race scientists'. During the
winter of 1941-42, 2.2 million Soviet prisoners of war were starved, frozen and
beaten to death in vast open-air pens by their Nazi captors whilst a further
1.3 million died in Nazi captivity by war's end, a slaughter rate only modified
by the Nazi regime's growing labour needs.
The
transition from German colonialism in Africa to Nazism in Europe was united by
the practice of racial genocide, with the concentration camp centre stage, all
buttressed by a biological racism which explained "genocidal episodes as
scientifically inevitable, even desirable".
Olusoga
and Erichsen's book is history writing at its best - a compelling narrative
fluently told, combining scholarly objectivity with moral outrage. Germany's colonial genocide in Namibia
deserves to be forgotten no longer, its underpinning in racial prejudice the
unsavoury link to later horrors of racial violence, and continuing race-based
social injustices, which benefit only the rich and powerful.
No comments:
Post a Comment